|
UN Security Council
Resolution 1282 |
|
|---|---|
| Date: | 14 December 1999 |
| Meeting no.: | 4,080 |
| Code: | S/RES/1282 (Document) |
|
|
|
| Vote: | For: 14 Abs.: 1 Against: 0 |
| Subject: | The situation concerning Western Sahara |
| Result: | Adopted |
|
|
|
| Security Council composition in 1999: | |
| permanent members: | |
| non-permanent members: | |
| ARG BHR BRA CAN GAB | |
| GAM MAS NAM NED SLO | |
|
|
|
| Road in Western Sahara | |
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1282, adopted on December 14, 1999, after reaffirming all previous resolutions on the question of the Western Sahara, in particular resolutions 1238 (1999) and 1263 (1999), the Council extended the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) until February 29, 2000 in order to complete the identification of voters.[1]
The Security Council also extended MINURSO's mandate to issue a second provisional voters list and initiate appeals for some tribal groupings. Morocco and the Polisario Front had agreed to draw up a plan on cross-border confidence-building measures and person-to-person contacts, and both were called upon to co-operate with MINURSO and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to implement the measures.
A large number of candidates had exercised their right of appeal and there was opposition to the issue of admissibility which meant that the referendum on self-determination for the people of Western Sahara could not take place before 2002 or beyond. The Secretary-General Kofi Annan was to help the parties reconcile, though the Council noted that there would be difficulties in this process. In this regard the Secretary-General was requested to report to the Council before the end of MINURSO's current mandate on the prospects of implementing the Settlement Plan within a reasonable period of time.
Resolution 1282 was adopted by 14 votes to none against and one abstention from Namibia;[2] the country had felt that the resolution ignored previous concerns of the Council and had portrayed a negative picture to the international community.[1]
|
|||||